Free Newsletter
REMS gets backlash from ESA, opioid camps
Most press coverage and conference presentations on the topic of risk evaluation and mitigation strategies include the message that REMS programs will become increasingly used by the FDA in drug approvals. And if the recent past is any indicator, that should be so.
But the REMS momentum may be slowing, especially for programs addressing risks for classes of drugs. Among the REMS-required drug classes are erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) and opioids. Affected groups near the end of the supply chain are beginning to squawk, reports Pharmacy Practice News in two articles.
A clinical pharmacy manager, for example, says the ESA REMS is having a noticeable impact on pharmacists and clinicians. Hospitals and clinics that dispense ESAs must assign a point person to create a program that oversees the hospital's use of the drugs.
The ESA REMS program also requires that healthcare professionals give patients the medication guide. And for ESA use in cancer patients, doctors must register and undergo training before they can prescribe. They must discuss risks and benefits with patients and provide written acknowledgment of the discussion.
Oncologists feel this burden. Their trade group, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, says it supports efforts to promote patient safety. But "we strenuously object to duplicative requirements that further diminish time and resources available for patient care."
Likewise, the class-wide REMS program for long-acting opioids also has increasingly vocal critics. Its goal was to decrease abuse, misuse, addiction and overdose deaths, according to three industry watcher/practitioners. But meaningful metrics for drug abuse or misuse, and drug addiction and drug-related overdose deaths are hard to come by, especially because so many such deaths involve multiple drugs.
"In the absence of clear standards," the authors write, "outcomes cannot be measured, and without such measures, an accurate evaluation of specific REMS is impossible."
- see the ESA REMS article (registration required)
- here's the opioid REMS article (registration required)
Related Articles:
Report: Add REMS to Sentinel System
FDA's Sharfstein talks REMS, track and trace
REMS sans registry may get one
Comments
The FDA has a REMS requirement enforced on only one opioid drug, Onsolis, which has reduced abuse potential due to its delivery technology.
The technology of Onsolis accomplishes what the FDA wants in principal, however, the product is scarcely prescribed due to the beaurocratic obstacles imposed by the REMS program.
If the small company that produces Onsolis has been forced by FDA to develop and comply with a REMS program, why won't FDA impose the same standards on all companies?
Why does the FDA refuse to halt sales, or impose penalties for non-compliance with the REMS policies for opioid drugs?
The illegal opioid drug trade depends on the inactity of the FDA in forcing compliance with the REMS program. Companies whose product sales must be scrutinized are delaying, delaying, delaying. Why does the FDA not equally enforce compliance?
Is it time to follow the money?????
Post new comment
Paid Research Reports
- Cloud Computing Adoption In The APAC Life Sciences Industry
- Pharmaceutical Licensing Overview
- Stakeholder Opinions: Vaccines in emerging markets (Latin America) - Opportunities in Brazil, Mexico and Argentina
- Pharmaceutical Key Trends 2010
- Commercial Insight: Top 20 Oncology Therapy Brands in Australia
- The Specialty Pharma Market Outlook: Key players, new company growth models and emerging opportunities


SHARE
WITH: